[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ShadowFS (status)
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: ShadowFS (status) |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 02:49:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.20i |
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 05:10:28PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > Importantly, that would get the permissions wrong.
> >
> > No, not if shadowfs made the needed checks.
>
> Um, what makes you think shadowfs even has the ability to open the
> file? It might be running with weaker permissions.
You are right. shadowfs fundamentally can not do the lookup itself.
I was wrong suggesting it to Moritz in the first place. Sorry Moritz!
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org brinkmd@debian.org
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
- Re: ShadowFS (status), (continued)
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status),
Marcus Brinkmann <=
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Niels Möller, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Steven Barker, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03