[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ShadowFS (status)
From: |
Moritz Schulte |
Subject: |
Re: ShadowFS (status) |
Date: |
27 Aug 2001 01:08:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> IIRC, the current implementation by Moritz does the lookup itself
> and returns the appropriate port as if it were its own.
If the user looks up a directory, he gets a port to a directory node,
which is managed by shadowfs. If the user looks up a file, he directly
gets a port to _that_ file, not a port to shadowfs.
> Doing a real retry is also nice and simple.
shadowfs puts a the port for the user into *retry_port in
netfs_S_dir_lookup().
> I think there were some issues with write support were it would make
> a difference.
Sorry, hmm, I can't remember such issues.
moritz
--
Moritz Schulte <moritz@chaosdorf.de> http://www.chaosdorf.de/moritz/
Debian/GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org/ http://www.gnu.org/
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
- Re: ShadowFS (status), (continued)
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status),
Moritz Schulte <=
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Niels Möller, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/27