[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non word abbrevs
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: non word abbrevs |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Nov 2021 15:03:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:17:28PM +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 1, 2021, at 21:43, Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs
> > text editor <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> wrote:
[...]
> >> :regexp "\\([<>=-]+\\)"
Oh, yes: always double your backslashes (well /nearly/ [1] always).
The first ones are for Lisp's string syntax.
[...]
> In a different world, I'd try [<>=-]{2,3}
Emacs is your world, then. Well, nearly :) It groks {} repetitions
(cf. the docs). Note that they are spelt with a backslash (don't
forget to double it in string context). This would give:
"...[<>=-]\\{2,3\\}..."
in your case (the dots are ellipses, for the rest of your regexp).
Cheers
[1] When you are writing the regexp in a Lisp string. Not when
you are entering it interactively, e.g. in the minibuffer.
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: non word abbrevs, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/11/01
- Re: non word abbrevs, Emanuel Berg, 2021/11/01
- Re: non word abbrevs, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/01
- Re: non word abbrevs, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/11/06
- Re: non word abbrevs, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/06
- Re: non word abbrevs, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/11/06
- Re: non word abbrevs, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/06
- Re: non word abbrevs, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/11/06
- Re: non word abbrevs, Emanuel Berg, 2021/11/07
- Re: non word abbrevs, Kevin Vigouroux, 2021/11/08
- Re: non word abbrevs, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/11/08
- Re: non word abbrevs, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/08