[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Disemvowelment Mode?

From: Grant Rettke
Subject: Re: Disemvowelment Mode?
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 14:12:40 -0500

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 3:02 AM Joost Kremers <address@hidden> wrote:
> The thing that I still don't understand, is why you would want to
> convert the document to shorthand at all?
> (AND)
> Why would it
> matter when some of the words are written in full?

I feel like it is easier to read when 100% is shortened instead of 3/4
that I shortened
and 1/4 that I didn't. I would only convert something like that.

> Isn't the purpose in the
> end to have a legible written version of the talk?

>From what I have tried so far the shorthand version is easy to read but yea if
I wrote it all perfectly like Paul explained then I would never convert it.

>  If you use a timer, there's no reason AFAICT to *not* create a minor mode for
> it.

Good point, thanks!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]