|
From: | Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: | Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding |
Date: | Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:02:21 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:40:35 +0200 From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> CC: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Eli Zaretskii wrote:Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:06:02 +0200 From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> CC: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.orgIf you look carefully at the output you can see that what is not handled is the parameters to "ls". If you try "ls -1" it will work.What "parameters to ls"? "ls" was invoked without any parameters.If you from a shell do ls | grep then normally ls implicitly gets the -1 parameterNo, it doesn't. Please try and see for yourself (I just did).
We are miscommunicating. Exactly what are you saying? I am saying that if I from a shell outside of Emacs do ls than I get several files listed on each row while the output from ls | grep some-file implies that ls got the implicit argument -1 when used in the pipe.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |