[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words *** |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Mar 2007 10:41:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
thorne <thinly-disguised@spam-sucks.foo> writes:
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> thorne <thorne@timbral.net> writes:
>>
>>> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>>>> That's just because vim does not offer a builtin 4-letter word to get
>>>> there.
>>>
>>> ??? What am i missing ???
>>
>
> Missing alt.religion.emacs? No, it gave me the hives.
Well, that is only appropriate since your signature gives Emacs the
hives. How about actually making it legal Elisp code?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, stj911, 2007/03/09
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, Muhammad, 2007/03/10
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, Tonico, 2007/03/10
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, David Hansen, 2007/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, David Kastrup, 2007/03/10
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, thorne, 2007/03/10
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, David Hansen, 2007/03/11
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, David Kastrup, 2007/03/11
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, thorne, 2007/03/11
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, Peter Danenberg, 2007/03/11
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, thorne, 2007/03/11
- Re: *** The most profound and the most fragrant words ***, David Kastrup, 2007/03/11