[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
From: |
Maciek Pasternacki |
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:29:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
On Boomtime, The Aftermath 40, 3170 YOLD, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
>>> What's missing for screen is the equivalent of C-x b or iswitchb.
>>
>> What's wrong with <hotkey> l (windowlist)? I rarely use more than
>> eight windows so I don't need sophisticated methods to choose...
>
> Well, you use multiple separate screen instances, I think.
>
> But for the use case where you have one screen containing all sessions
> (with multiple xterms attached via "screen -x"), you'll get many
> sessions. Something that's useful is to give them names that say
> something about the purpose.
<hotkey> : title <title> RET
> It seems to be natural for me to type C-o b frumple RET, say, to
> switch to the screen session where I logged in on frumple. Or C-o b
> root@frumple RET for the root session on frumple.
<hotkey> ' <title> RET (select)
<hotkey> " (windowlist)
> But that's not my usage pattern. I create sessions on demand, and
> then the number is not predictable.
You can create sessions with screen -t (either from shell-under-screen
(`screen' command in shell under screen sees $STY environment variable
and knows where it is) or from <hotkey> : command line), you can give
title to a session with <hotkey> : title.
Greets,
--japhy
--
__ Maciek Pasternacki <maciekp@japhy.fnord.org> [ http://japhy.fnord.org/ ]
`| _ |_\ / { I tell you this, no eternal reward will forgive us now
,|{-}|}| }\/ for wasting the dawn! }
\/ |____/ ( Jim Morrison ) -><-
- Re: emacs for everything?, (continued)
- Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/11/21
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/20
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, John Sullivan, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/23
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/26
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?,
Maciek Pasternacki <=
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/28
- Re: emacs for everything?, Daniel Pittman, 2004/11/27
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Mike, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Lee Sau Dan, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Leonardo Boiko, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Leonardo Boiko, 2004/11/24
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/11/24