[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bpp plus type constrain
From: |
Michael Hennebry |
Subject: |
Re: bpp plus type constrain |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:36:01 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) |
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023, Leonardo Corato wrote:
About the upper bound, I realized the bins could't have been enough, so my
first code was a greedy solution: 1 bin per 1 item.
Two items per bin would also work.
Do you think I should write the full bpp with types, code? Maybe it could
help someone.
I'm not sure what you are asking.
If you are asking whether you should publish your gmpl,
why not?
It couldn't hurt.
BTW you still have not dealt with symmetry.
10 bins can be permuted more than 3 million ways.
15 bins more than a trillion ways.
--
Michael hennebry@mail.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu
"Occasionally irrational explanations are required" -- Luke Roman
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/04
- Message not available
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/05
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Leonardo Corato, 2023/10/06
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Graciela Coitinho, 2023/10/06
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/06
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/09
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Leonardo Corato, 2023/10/11
- Re: bpp plus type constrain,
Michael Hennebry <=
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/06
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/06