[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Max cfservd connections
From: |
David Masterson |
Subject: |
RE: Max cfservd connections |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:52:34 -0700 |
A large system with many network connections in an environment supporting
thousands of machines and (for whatever reason) no use of SplayTime?
Also consider the reverse -- a tightly controlled *small* system that a user
wants to severely limit the maxprocesses to prevent runaways, so he lowers
maxprocesses.
Mark Burgess wrote:
> Fair enough - it was meant to be a silly number. I did not anticipate
> anyone contemplating this. I would be interested to know he
> circumstances in which it is actual to expect 1000 simulaneous
> connections to a single machine.
>
> M
>
> On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 10:13 -0700, David Masterson wrote:
>> Arbitrary numbers should be configuration items. ;-)
>>
>> Mark Burgess wrote:
>>> This is just an arbitrary number. Most systems will not want to go
>>> higher -- but if you do, then change it.
>>> M
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 16:14 -0700, Martin, Jason H wrote:
>>>> I'm curious, does anyone know why cfservd is limited to 1000
>>>> concurrent connections?
>>>>
>>>>> From the latest cfservd.c:
>>>> if ((CFD_MAXPROCESSES < 1) || (CFD_MAXPROCESSES > 1000)) {
>>>> FatalError("cfservd MaxConnections with silly value");
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> -Jason Martin
- Max cfservd connections, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/17
- RE: Max cfservd connections, David Masterson, 2005/10/18
- RE: Max cfservd connections,
David Masterson <=
- RE: Max cfservd connections, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/18
- RE: Max cfservd connections, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/18
- RE: Max cfservd connections, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/18
- RE: Max cfservd connections, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/18