[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Max cfservd connections
From: |
Mark Burgess |
Subject: |
RE: Max cfservd connections |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:40:49 +0200 |
Fair enough - it was meant to be a silly number. I did not anticipate
anyone contemplating this. I would be interested to know he
circumstances in which it is actual to expect 1000 simulaneous
connections to a single machine.
M
M
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 10:13 -0700, David Masterson wrote:
> Arbitrary numbers should be configuration items. ;-)
>
> Mark Burgess wrote:
> > This is just an arbitrary number. Most systems will not want to go
> > higher -- but if you do, then change it.
> > M
> >
> > On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 16:14 -0700, Martin, Jason H wrote:
> >> I'm curious, does anyone know why cfservd is limited to 1000
> >> concurrent connections?
> >>
> >>> From the latest cfservd.c:
> >> if ((CFD_MAXPROCESSES < 1) || (CFD_MAXPROCESSES > 1000)) {
> >> FatalError("cfservd MaxConnections with silly value"); }
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> -Jason Martin
- Max cfservd connections, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/17
- RE: Max cfservd connections, David Masterson, 2005/10/18
- RE: Max cfservd connections,
Mark Burgess <=
- RE: Max cfservd connections, David Masterson, 2005/10/18
- RE: Max cfservd connections, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/18
- RE: Max cfservd connections, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/18
- RE: Max cfservd connections, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/18
- RE: Max cfservd connections, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/18