[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?
From: |
David Masterson |
Subject: |
RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ? |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:28:01 -0700 |
Jason Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 October 2005 13:29, Martin, Jason H wrote:
>> Try putting in an 'alert' stanza that is always true (such as
>> FOO|!FOO). Also, cfexecd doesn't send any mail unless the output
>> differs from the previous run, so you might have to put in a
>> shellcommand that echos something to the previous file to make it
>> different then the current file.
>>
> I use the something like the following to ensure that my sysadmins
> get bugged every time something fails. I ran into a problem where
> something failed consistently, but only alerted once so it got lost
> in the ether...
>
> alerts:
> # Bad configs, error out
> bad_configs::
> "Config error [$(date)]: Bad thingy, update aborted."
Could you be a bit more complete? How does "bad_configs" get set?
--
David Masterson
VMware, Inc.
Palo Alto, CA
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, (continued)
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?,
David Masterson <=
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/12
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/12
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/12