hypothesis violation (was Re: [Heartlogic-dev] tentative plan)

[Joshua N Pritikin]

On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 01:50 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> See espec 
> dicussion section of chapter about study 3.  also conclusion chapter, 
> maybe also disucssion section of chapter about study 2.  think about
> how to use a flowchart to answer some of the explanations of those
> items 
> that did not live up to hypothesis

I re-read those parts just now.  The discussion of comments is mostly
confined to study #2.  What I found in study #3 is a lot of discussion
of the fine points of the statistics and associated guesswork about
the cause of the inconsistent results.

I did not find a proposal for the kind of flow-chart study which I
want to do.

-- 
If you are an American then support http://fairtax.org
 (Permanently replace 50,000+ pages of tax law with about 200 pages.)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part