[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Heartlogic-dev] the plan
From: |
William L. Jarrold |
Subject: |
Re: [Heartlogic-dev] the plan |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:27:00 -0500 (CDT) |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
OHL v2 will have three activities:
1. Rating the believability of goal status (Goal, Anti-goal, NoGoal) of
various participants. This corresponds to level 'g'.
For registered users,
2. Something very similar to the WLJ 2003 study.
3. The ability to create new cues for activity #1. Also, the ability to
see some stats about how people rated the believability of goal status
in various situations.
Comments?
Can you expand #1 ever so slightly. E.g. a one or two paragraph version.
Shoot I know we talked about this, but we talked about many things.
Is there a hypothesis? What is it?
But basically, I think I am game for trying out a mixture of different
studies. We'll need to get one or two or maybe three pretty well nailed
down. Then we can publicize and get many respondants.
There may be a way of replicating only a portion of my dissertation so as
not to require so many subjects. After I analyze the data collected so
far, I can ask statistical services consulting at UT about this.
Bill
--
If you are an American then support http://fairtax.org
(Permanently replace 50,000+ pages of tax law with about 200 pages.)
- [Heartlogic-dev] the plan, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/04/10
- Re: [Heartlogic-dev] the plan,
William L. Jarrold <=
- Re: [Heartlogic-dev] the plan, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/04/12
- Re: [Heartlogic-dev] the plan, William L. Jarrold, 2005/04/12
- Re: [Heartlogic-dev] the plan, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/04/12
- Re: [Heartlogic-dev] the plan, William L. Jarrold, 2005/04/13
- Re: [Heartlogic-dev] the plan, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/04/13
- Re: [Heartlogic-dev] the plan, William L. Jarrold, 2005/04/15
- [Heartlogic-dev] new idea, William L. Jarrold, 2005/04/15
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] new idea, Josh White, 2005/04/15