Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja

[Tuomas Lukka]

On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:38:00PM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> >I guess, in the end, for me, the most important distinction is whether
> >*I* completely understand the feature and all of its consequences...
> >which certainly isn't true for containment.
> 
> as I said on IRC, I was a bit grumpy this morning; sorry. Let's simply 
> leave it here; as far as I can see, we agree on the next steps anyway, 
> and if we have slightly different positions on whether containment is 
> experimental or not, well, that's fine ;-)

A general principle might be that if there's argument about something
being experimental or not, the burden of proof should rest on those who
consider it not experimental.

I actually think that xubuoy should not be on the default view list of Gzz.py,
either, for the same reason.

Hmm... maybe we should freeze (not maybe quite yet, but soon .. alpha5 or so) 
the interface that Gzz.py starts, so that it may only be changed through PEGs,
and that those PEGs should be *VERY* explicit about both the actions *AND* 
the graphics of the UI.

        Tuomas