Re: [Gzz] New PEG: email_storage--marc

[Benja Fallenstein]

Tuomas Lukka wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:39:29AM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
>  
>
> > Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > Is it allowed to just define our own access-type like that? 
> > > Or should we use a "x-..." type or ask IANA for an identifier?
> > >
> > >      
> > I don't think x-types are allowed either, but have to check :-/ -- but 
> > it may still be a good way to mark that we're not using a registered 
> > type. I think registering means publishing an RFC, which at this point 
> > seems overkill (esp. as we're *not* sending e-mail with these access 
> > types, which is what the RFCs assume).
> >    
>
> Still, it's important to adhere to standards - let's not pull a Microsoft.

Yes, that's true. I'll take a careful look at the standards today and 
report back.

> > Coming up with a format for sending email bodies as enfilades is, of 
> > course, another issue entirely...
> >    
>
> Yes. One that *will* need an RFC.

Hey, that's a good idea :-)

So we should submit:
- Storm
- an enfilade serialization format

for publication as RFCs...

- Benja

>         Tuomas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzz-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gzz-dev
>
>
>