[Gzz-commits] storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah peg.rst

[Hermanni Hyytiälä]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/storm
Module name:    storm
Branch:         
Changes by:     Hermanni Hyytiälä <address@hidden>      03/06/11 08:25:38

Modified files:
        doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah: peg.rst 

Log message:
        twid

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/storm/storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst.diff?tr1=1.24&tr2=1.25&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst
diff -u storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.24 
storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.25
--- storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.24     Wed Jun 11 
08:04:12 2003
+++ storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst  Wed Jun 11 08:25:38 2003
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
 
 :Authors:  Hermanni Hyytiälä
 :Date-Created: 2003-06-05
-:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/06/11 12:04:12 $
-:Revision: $Revision: 1.24 $
+:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/06/11 12:25:38 $
+:Revision: $Revision: 1.25 $
 :Status:   Incomplete
 
 .. :Stakeholders:
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
 ~10000 peers: 6 (average)
 ~16000 peers: 7 (average)
 
-Chord's fault tolerance properties include (from the figures):
+Chord's fault tolerance properties include (from figures):
 
 Simultaneous peer failures: 
 - Randomly selected fraction of nodes fail
@@ -133,10 +133,18 @@
 - Result: 6.5% of lookups fail, when peer join/leave rate per second
   is 0.1 (corresponds to peer joining and leaving every 10 seconds
   on average)
+  
+  
+The results we expect from the experiment:
 
+- GISP has O(log n) lookup efficiency, e.g., with 10000 peers
+  the lookup length is 6 (average)
+
+.. more to come
+  
 
-Eventually, we will compare (and validate) our test results with the Chord's 
-fault tolerance properties.
+We will compare (and validate) our test results with the Chord's 
+performance and fault tolerance properties.
 
 Simulation Process: 
 - Fraction of "dumb" peers is constant: create 9*10^k normal peers, 
@@ -202,7 +210,7 @@
        
        Please notice, however, the word "SHOULD".
        
-ISSUE: Related to the prevous issue, how (non) "uselessness" is 
+ISSUE: Related to the previous issue, how (non) "uselessness" is 
        determined by a GISP peer and is it a reliable method ?
 
 Changes