[Gzz-commits] storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah peg.rst

[Hermanni Hyytiälä]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/storm
Module name:    storm
Branch:         
Changes by:     Hermanni Hyytiälä <address@hidden>      03/06/11 05:28:52

Modified files:
        doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah: peg.rst 

Log message:
        two issues

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/storm/storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst.diff?tr1=1.20&tr2=1.21&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst
diff -u storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.20 
storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.21
--- storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.20     Wed Jun 11 
05:24:04 2003
+++ storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst  Wed Jun 11 05:28:52 2003
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
 
 :Authors:  Hermanni Hyytiälä
 :Date-Created: 2003-06-05
-:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/06/11 09:24:04 $
-:Revision: $Revision: 1.20 $
+:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/06/11 09:28:52 $
+:Revision: $Revision: 1.21 $
 :Status:   Incomplete
 
 .. :Stakeholders:
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@
 - Has no specific mechanism to heal partitioned peer groups
 - Additional redundancy can be achievied using a "successor-list",
   e.g., O(log n) successor peers
+- Numerial metric: no "peer-choice" during lookups
 
 The assumption for the results above is that the system is "in the steady 
state", 
 according to the authors.
@@ -190,9 +191,13 @@
 Issues
 ======
 
+ISSUE: When should we discuss this with the author of GISP?
 
-ISSUE: When should we discuss this with the author of GISP?      
+ISSUE: Does GISP support "peer-choice" during lookups?
 
+ISSUE: Does GISP peer is able determine if an another peer is
+       not "useful" or not (not just PING scenario)  ("a peer can discard
+       information of unreachable peers")    
 
 Changes
 =======