[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#43249]
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
[bug#43249] |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:38:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 |
Brendan Tildesley <mail@brendan.scot> writes:
> On 10/9/20 11:22 pm, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Brendan Tildesley <mail@brendan.scot> writes:
>>
>>> I guess then we should patch wrap-program to add
>>>
>>> (when (wrapper? prog)
>>> (error (string-append prog " is a wrapper. Refusing to wrap.")))
>> Should it really refuse to wrap or *add* its variables to the existing
>> wrapper?
>>
> If there is a /bin/foo and /bin/.foo-real created by wrap-program, and
> we are to run another wrap-program phase, under what circumstances
> would it /not/ be a mistake to call (wrap-program "/bin/.foo-real")
> instead of (wrap-program "/bin/foo")? And if the first one was called,
> probably it was because find-files was used and the packager didn't
> realise it was happening, and therefore it will be double-wrapped,
> like gedit is.
Oh, yes, that would be a mistake.
--
Ricardo
- [bug#43249] Resolve Calibre run-time dependency, (continued)
- [bug#43249], Prafulla Giri, 2020/09/08
- [bug#43249], Brendan Tildesley, 2020/09/08
- [bug#43249], Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/08
- [bug#43249], Brendan Tildesley, 2020/09/10
- [bug#43249], Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/10
- [bug#43249], Brendan Tildesley, 2020/09/11
- [bug#43249],
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- [bug#43249], Brendan Tildesley, 2020/09/12
- [bug#43249], Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/12
[bug#43249], Brendan Tildesley, 2020/09/13