|
| From: | Brendan Tildesley |
| Subject: | [bug#43249] |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:38:25 +1000 |
On 8/9/20 10:22 pm, Prafulla Giri wrote:
I see. Yes, it does make sense now why you chose to replace the 'wrap phase.I wonder.... perhaps it'd be better altogether if the (wrap-program) procedure could be re-written to not make ..*.real.real programs...? That would save us a lot of code-duplication...
Actually there is such a thing that can be use for scripts. It's wrap-script. I had sort of forgotten about it because I believe it has a bug where it passes command line arguments incorrectly, so wasn't using it: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/40039 . Would be worth looking in to again.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |