[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 23:35:53 -0700 (PDT) |
> But Rx ain't cheap -- it's a lot of code, and a lot of
> run-time memory.
More precisely:
It's a decent amount of run-time memory if yr running hard expressions
and want optimal performance. You can limit run-time allocation
pretty low (a couple 10K) and get _ok_ performance and great
correctness (and good performance on very simple expressions).
Basically, the space/time trade-off is reduced to a parameter that you
can tweak at run-time.
"whatever",
-t
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Robert Uhl, 2003/04/28
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, MJ Ray, 2003/04/29
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/04/29
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Ken Anderson, 2003/04/29
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, tomas, 2003/04/30
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/04/30
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions,
Tom Lord <=
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/04/30
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, tomas, 2003/04/30
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/04/30
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Robert Uhl, 2003/04/30