[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:06:30 -0000 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
Robert Uhl <address@hidden> wrote:
> That's useful for some things (when the developer writes the regexps),
> but for others it's not so good, e.g. when the _user_ writes the
> regexps. The user probably wants whatever he's locally used to...
Basic, Extended, Perl, ... this probably is general, not just ours.
> And then, of course, there's the issue of speed. Regexps are used for
> enough processing that IMHO they must be matched by compiled, not
> interpreted, code or they risk being unacceptably slow. [...]
Compiled code is just interpreted code at a different level, surely? A
good optimisation will often beat dropping down levels, and scheme allows
easier optimisation while avoiding some typical errors. Do the minimum
directly in C, IMHO.
--
MJR http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ IM: address@hidden
This is my home web site. This for Jabber Messaging.
How's my writing? Let me know via any of my contact details.
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, (continued)
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Rob Browning, 2003/04/28
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, MJ Ray, 2003/04/28
- Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], tomas, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], Thamer Al-Harbash, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme, Ken Anderson, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], Robert Uhl, 2003/04/30
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], Thamer Al-Harbash, 2003/04/30
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], tomas, 2003/04/30
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Robert Uhl, 2003/04/28
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions,
MJ Ray <=
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/04/29
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Ken Anderson, 2003/04/29
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, tomas, 2003/04/30
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/04/30
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/04/30
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/04/30
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, tomas, 2003/04/30
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/04/30
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Robert Uhl, 2003/04/30