[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: entries and guile-gui
From: |
Kevin Ryde |
Subject: |
Re: entries and guile-gui |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:19:52 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
> It looks like #f now (Gtk+ 2.0) means "carry on calling other handlers
> for this signal" and non-#f (which includes the unspecified value)
I wonder if interpreting unspecified as true there is a good idea.
Unspecified almost certainly means the callback hasn't realized it
should be returning true/false. What about throwing an error for that
case (any callback that returns bool), to keep people out of trouble?
> There may be some other factor then. I'm going to leave this for now
> though; I'll come back to it if the issue/question crops up again.
Maybe gtk 2 has further handlers in the dispatch which gtk 1.2 didn't.
At any rate, if it works that's enough.
- Re: entries and guile-gui, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/21
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Kevin Ryde, 2007/02/21
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Kevin Ryde, 2007/02/21
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Kevin Ryde, 2007/02/21
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/22
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/22
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/22
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/24
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Kevin Ryde, 2007/02/25
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/26
- Re: entries and guile-gui,
Kevin Ryde <=
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/28
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/22