[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: G-Wrap 1.9.3rc1 -- please test
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: G-Wrap 1.9.3rc1 -- please test |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:07:10 +0200 |
Yo Jan,
On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 21:38 +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> (gnome gtk): [goops gobject WARNING: (gnome gobject gclosure): `gtype:genum'
> imported from both (gnome gobject gtype) and (gnome gobject gvalue)
[...]
These should be fixed in the latest prerelease.
> ?: 103 [gflags-register-static "GparamSpecFlags" #(# # # # ...)]
>
> <unnamed port>: In procedure gflags-register-static in expression
> (gflags-register-static (or # #) (or # #)):
> <unnamed port>: string is read-only: "Readable"
I guess recent guile CVS changes do funny things with the C
representation of strings. The offending code is in
glib/gnome/gobject/gvalue.c:scm_gflags_register_static. No idea what
could be triggering the warning tho, as we don't modify the strings.
Maybe SCM_STRING_CHARS changed.
Peace,
--
Andy Wingo <address@hidden>
http://ambient.2y.net/wingo/
- G-Wrap 1.9.3rc1 -- please test, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/09/26
- Re: G-Wrap 1.9.3rc1 -- please test, David Pirotte, 2004/09/26
- Re: G-Wrap 1.9.3rc1 -- please test, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/09/26
- Re: G-Wrap 1.9.3rc1 -- please test, David Pirotte, 2004/09/26
- Re: G-Wrap 1.9.3rc1 -- please test, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/09/26
- g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Andy Wingo, 2004/09/28
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/09/29
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Andy Wingo, 2004/09/29
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/09/29
Re: G-Wrap 1.9.3rc1 -- please test, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/26
- Re: G-Wrap 1.9.3rc1 -- please test,
Andy Wingo <=
Re: G-Wrap 1.9.3rc1 -- please test, Andy Wingo, 2004/09/28