guile-gtk-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFD: CVS or Arch?


From: Andreas Rottmann
Subject: Re: RFD: CVS or Arch?
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:01:10 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

>> I thought rather about generating configure.in than the Makefile.am:s,
>
> If you have multiple categories that have files in the same directories,
> you still need to have Makefile.am magic happen.
>
Categories will live in separate directories.

> And when directories are in or out, then SUBDIRS needs to
> change. Good luck, but don't make it too complicated ;)
>
You seem to havean argument here. Maybe the top-level Makefile.am has
to be generated. Anyway, as I said[0], I deferred the archive
modularization until things have settled a bit wrt Arch.

[0] http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-gtk-general/2004-02/msg00002.html

Rotty
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden      | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://yi.org/rotty      | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

Python is executable pseudocode, Perl is executable line-noise.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]