[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die! |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:28:51 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) |
address@hidden writes:
> How about 'gu', a really portable guile kernel that can be used to
> bootstrap? It seems that a lot of the portability problems of 'sh'
> are syntax / feature set problems. Wouldn't it be worth the effort
> to work on a (non-interactive) guile-core shell?
Sounds good to me in theory :> Though I haven't thought enough about
it to have a good idea about what might be involved...
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
- AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2003/02/15
- AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2003/02/15
- Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!, Rob Browning, 2003/02/15
- Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2003/02/15
- Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!, Tom Lord, 2003/02/15
- Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!, tomas, 2003/02/18
- Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!, Rob Browning, 2003/02/18
- Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!, rm, 2003/02/18
- Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!, tomas, 2003/02/19
- Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die!, Rob Browning, 2003/02/15