[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] fs/xfs: Avoid unreadble filesystem if V4 superblock
From: |
Daniel Kiper |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] fs/xfs: Avoid unreadble filesystem if V4 superblock |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Sep 2021 15:31:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Erwan Velu wrote:
> [...]
> Nope...
>
> I'm pretty new at contributing to see project but I really wonder what's the
> rational being this.
> I mean, 2.06 is very recent, debuting its life cycle and its now known as
> totally broken on XFS V4 and we have here a very simple patch.
> How can we prevent users from installing this release ?
> Can't we get a point release or even maybe a 2.07 and a statement reporting
> that 2.06 is not suitable for XFS v4 based system.
> I'm very uncomfortable knowing the release is broken on some config (including
> mine) and new people will be caught in the same trap.
> Sorry to ask maybe a question that got asked zillion times, but that sounds
> important to me that we can project users that didn't reboot yet with this
> release.
Making a release is a big hassle for the project right now. I hope it
will change in the future but it is what it is. I think distros will
take this patch immediately. If that helps I can announce here in
separate thread when patch lands in the git repository.
Daniel
Where is the testing? (was: Re: [PATCH] fs/xfs: Avoid unreadble filesystem if V4 superblock), Glenn Washburn, 2021/09/07
Re: Where is the testing? (was: Re: [PATCH] fs/xfs: Avoid unreadble filesystem if V4 superblock), Daniel Kiper, 2021/09/08
Re: Where is the testing? (was: Re: [PATCH] fs/xfs: Avoid unreadble filesystem if V4 superblock), Glenn Washburn, 2021/09/08
Re: Where is the testing? (was: Re: [PATCH] fs/xfs: Avoid unreadble filesystem if V4 superblock), Daniel Kiper, 2021/09/14