[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.23.0 RC4 status and post-1.23.0 Git branch force-push pending
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: 1.23.0 RC4 status and post-1.23.0 Git branch force-push pending |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Mar 2023 21:21:42 -0500 |
At 2023-03-22T17:49:29-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> This means I have rebased the post-1.23.0 branch against master,
> desyncing it, and I will have to force-push it. This will make the
> branch more difficult for other people to use. Sorry about that. :(
I changed my mind about this, and created a "branden-post-1.23.0" branch
anyway, without changing "post-1.23.0".
> While we're waiting for the 1.23.0 final release to happen, it might
> be better if people create their own branches of master to push their
> work to. (In the future, I'll use a name like "branden-post-1.23.0"
> for this sort of thing.)
>
> Since that bridge is crossed, I'll also revise the post-1.23.0 branch
> to tidy up the commits as I would with a GitHub-style PR.
This is done, but on the new branden-post-1.23.0 branch, and pushed.
I've organized the commits in the branden-post-1.23.0 branch in the
following order.
1. Changes that affect only plain text files.
2. 1 + changes to man pages and our Texinfo manual.
3. 2 + changes to test scripts.
4. 3 + changes to Automake/Autoconf files.
5. 4 + changes to Perl scripts.
6. 5 + changes to macro files.
7. 6 + changes to .c and .cpp files.
Subjectively speaking, these are organized by increasing risk.
Personally, I would like to see things up to and including #4 in RC 4,
but it's Bertrand's call.
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature