[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?
From: |
Gerard Lally |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible? |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:46:11 +0100 |
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, at 23:38, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
>
> Just for the lulz, check this out:
>
> www.usm.uni-muenchen.de/~hoffmann/roff/tmp/dtp.pdf
>
> (I'll take it back down tomorrow). And try to imagine some
> fancier fonts with this.
Woah! Amazing! Any chance you can upload the source?
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, (continued)
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Ted Harding, 2016/10/23
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Peter Schaffter, 2016/10/23
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?,
Gerard Lally <=
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, John Gardner, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2016/10/25
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Steve Izma, 2016/10/25
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Damian McGuckin, 2016/10/25
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Mike Bianchi, 2016/10/26
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Doug McIlroy, 2016/10/23
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Ted Harding, 2016/10/25