[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 03:16:25 +0100 (CET) |
> A point about development practice: I believe that in a
> version-control system with real changesets, the ChangeLog
> convention is obsolete. The whole-commit information that went in
> ChangeLog entries now naturally lives in per-changeset comments.
>
> Can you think of any reason I shouldn't put comments explaining this
> at the top of each ChangeLog?
Right now, I would like to stay with ChangeLog entries in the usual
way. A new maintainer might change this, say, to use git commit
entries only, generating a ChangeLog file automatically. IMHO, the
right time to do such a switch is immediately after a new release.
Werner
Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion, Bernd Warken, 2013/12/10
- Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/12/10
- Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion, Heinz-Jürgen Oertel, 2013/12/22
- Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion, Daode, 2013/12/22
- Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion, Heinz-Jürgen Oertel, 2013/12/23
- Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion, Daode, 2013/12/23
- Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/12/24
- Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion, Heinz-Jürgen Oertel, 2013/12/24