[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Dec 2013 06:24:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
>
> > This repo is clean and I believe it's ready to be used for
> > production.
>
> Excellent! Thanks a lot, Eric, the git conversion looks very good
> now. If noone objects, please proceed and upload it to Savannah.
Will do, but I'll give it a few days for Keith and others to look it over.
A point about development practice: I believe that in a
version-control system with real changesets, the ChangeLog convention
is obsolete. The whole-commit information that went in ChangeLog
entries now naturally lives in per-changeset comments.
Can you think of any reason I shouldn't put comments explaining this
at the top of each ChangeLog?
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
Re: [Groff] Second try at git conversion, Bernd Warken, 2013/12/10