[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX

From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 08:54:30 +0200 (CEST)

>> > groff to XML to HTML via doclifter produces better HTML than any of
>> > the direct groff -> HTML tools.
>> Sadly, this is true.  grohtml would need a big hug with much love to
>> grow up, but currently nobody really takes care of it.
> The problem is fundamental - a good conversion needs structural
> analysis as good as doclifter's, which is *hard*.

Yes.  However, grohtml would be able to do different things, in a
different way, and with proper markup the results could be excellent
also.  Sigh.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]