Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX

[Eric S. Raymond]

Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
> 
> > groff to XML to HTML via doclifter produces better HTML than any of
> > the direct groff -> HTML tools.
> 
> Sadly, this is true.  grohtml would need a big hug with much love to
> grow up, but currently nobody really takes care of it.

The problem is fundamental - a good conversion needs structural
analysis as good as doclifter's, which is *hard*.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>