[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Groff] Proposal for raster graphics extensions to gpic

From: Egil Kvaleberg
Subject: RE: [Groff] Proposal for raster graphics extensions to gpic
Date: 29 Nov 2002 16:34:09 +0100

On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 14:44, James Deri wrote:
> Dealing with these sort of volumes running through
> pre-processors/macros adds to the runtimes.

Enabling images to be presented to grops in forms other than ps might
*enable* improvementes in efficiency to be made. But it certainly does
not happen by itself.

> and the raw speed of its typesetting abilities.

Could be an issue, although I would think that the differences in
efficiency at this stage does not really contribute very much to overall

> > So there is no reason to make things more low level then absolutely
> > necessary. Especially so when the low-levelness does not bring any
> > advantages for the user. 
> Low Level = increased performance.

In this case, you would not notice much of a difference either way.

Email: address@hidden  
Voice/videophone: +47 22523641 Voice: +47 92022780 Fax: +47 22525899
Mail:  Egil Kvaleberg, Husebybakken 14A, 0379 Oslo, Norway

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]