[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[groff] 34/41: groff_char(7): Fix content nits.
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
[groff] 34/41: groff_char(7): Fix content nits. |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:41:32 -0400 (EDT) |
gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
in repository groff.
commit db02fba94993a9964b1e464e86cf73bb601dbd60
Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Thu Mar 17 11:38:19 2022 +1100
groff_char(7): Fix content nits.
* Explicitly identify what "automatically" loads "composite.tmac".
* Fix bug in logical symbols table to show the output distinction (if
any) between | and \[or].
* It is now less certain that the square became filled in the bold font.
* Explain why the plus, minus, and equals sign appeared in the original
AT&T "special" font, and indirectly why so much fuss is made about
these three glyphs today (on top of dash/hyphen/minus confustion).
* Document original mnemonic for \[bv] in a comment, because it would be
misleading today.
* Clarify what "composite.tmac" does.
* Migrate terminology: "escape" -> "escape sequence".
---
man/groff_char.7.man | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/groff_char.7.man b/man/groff_char.7.man
index 0c0cf2c8..42cd81e8 100644
--- a/man/groff_char.7.man
+++ b/man/groff_char.7.man
@@ -1879,7 +1879,11 @@ The glyph resembling an underscore is a baseline rule,
and that resembling a vertical line is a box rule.
.
In bold,
+according to some sources,
the square became filled.
+.\" In the Holt, Reinhart, Winston edition of the _Unix Programmer's
+.\" Manual_, Revised and Expanded Version, Volume 2 (1983), the square
+.\" in Times bold is _not_ shown as filled on page 226. -- GBR
.
In italics,
the box rule was not slanted.
@@ -1906,6 +1910,19 @@ The special font supplied the missing ASCII and Teletype
extended
glyphs,
among several others.
.
+The plus,
+minus,
+and equals signs appeared in the special font despite availability in
+text fonts \[lq]to insulate the appearance of equations from the choice
+of standard [read: text] fonts\[rq].
+.
+Recall that
+.I troff \" AT&T
+was turned to the task of mathematical typesetting as soon as it was
+developed.
+.
+.
+.P
We note that AT&T took the opportunity to de-unify the apostrophe
and acute accent
(a choice ISO later duplicated in its 8859 series of standards).
@@ -1947,6 +1964,11 @@ No equivalent was available on the C/A/T;
the box rule
.BR \[rs][br] ,
brace vertical extension
+.\" CSTR #54 (1976 edition) called this the "bold vertical", probably
+.\" because it was thicker than the box rule and matched the thickness
+.\" of the bracket pieces \(lt, \(lb, \(rt, \(rb, \(lk, \(rk, and so on.
+.\" Saying "bold" could be misleading because it appeared only in the
+.\" special font, not a bold text font.
.BR \[rs][bv] ,
and \[lq]or\[rq] operator
.BR \[rs][or] ,
@@ -1963,8 +1985,8 @@ The files below are loaded automatically by the default
.
.TP
.I @MACRODIR@/\:\%composite\:.tmac
-assigns mappings for glyphs after the first in a composite special
-character.
+assigns alternate mappings for identifiers after the first in a
+composite special character escape sequence.
.
See subsection \[lq]Accents\[rq] above.
.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [groff] 34/41: groff_char(7): Fix content nits.,
G. Branden Robinson <=