[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: socket activation and -n?
From: |
Bernd Zeimetz |
Subject: |
Re: socket activation and -n? |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Feb 2020 02:13:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 |
On 2/11/20 1:32 AM, Russell Nelson wrote:
> How can I get systemd (spit!) to start gpsd as if I was running it by hand?
well, figure out why systemd is not doing what you want?
- did you run systemctl daemon-reload after removing your files?
- what does
systemctl status gpsd.socket
systemctl status gpsd.service
journalctl -u gppsd.service
say?
> -- gpsd.service which starts gpsd but isn't publishing to dbus
>
> [Unit]
> Description=GPS (Global Positioning System) Daemon
> Requires=edge_config_gps_modem.service
> After=edge_config_gps_modem.service
>
> [Service]
> EnvironmentFile=/var/summit-edge/gpsd.conf
> ExecStart=/usr/sbin/gpsd -b -N -n ${GPSTTY}
> Restart=on-failure
> RestartSec=10s
>
> [Install]
> WantedBy=multi-user.target
that looks okay. Are you sure that your edge_config_gps_modem.service
only returns when ${GPSTTY} is actually available?
Using udev would be the appropriate way...
Whats in the log? Check the journcalctl output from above and also look
into your daemon.log/messages...
> -- gpsd command which works
>
> /usr/sbin/gpsd -b -N -n /dev/ttyUSB1
>
> -- gpsd version
> {"class":"VERSION","release":"3.14","rev":"3.14","proto_major":3,"proto_minor":10}
... get a new gpsd version. Not sure if socket activation actually
worked back then.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
- Re: socket activation and -n?, (continued)
- Re: socket activation and -n?, Gary E. Miller, 2020/02/11
- Re: socket activation and -n?, Dominic Amann, 2020/02/12
- Re: socket activation and -n?, Gary E. Miller, 2020/02/12
- Re: socket activation and -n?, Dominic Amann, 2020/02/12
- Re: socket activation and -n?, Russell Nelson, 2020/02/12
- Re: socket activation and -n?, Dominic Amann, 2020/02/12
- Re: socket activation and -n?, Alexander Carver, 2020/02/12
- Re: socket activation and -n?, Russell Nelson, 2020/02/13
- Re: socket activation and -n?, Alexander Carver, 2020/02/13
- Re: socket activation and -n?, Russell Nelson, 2020/02/13
Re: socket activation and -n?,
Bernd Zeimetz <=