[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD
From: |
Bernd Zeimetz |
Subject: |
Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Dec 2019 21:45:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 |
On 12/21/19 8:37 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
>
>> will be interesting to find it as it is not easy reproducible.
>
> Have you tried WRITE_PAD=0.0 on NetBSD or FreeBSD?
I've tried several variants of 0 <= WRITE_PAD <= 1 on FreeBSD, none with
a reproducible result.
Also I completely fail to understand why this is needed at all, it must
be a workaround for some bug, where ever that is.
> sys netbsd8 platform NetBSD-8.1-amd64-x86_64-64bit-ELF: WRITE_PAD = 0.00000
> Regression test FAILED: 69 errors in 135 tests total (0 not found).
> scons: *** [gps-regress] Error 69
> 13 Test timed out: maybe increase WRITE_PAD (= 0.0)
>
> I just noticed this:
> -$GPGSA,A,3,29,11,1,3,28,,,,,,,,5.2,3.1,3.3*34
> +$GPGSA,A,3,1,11,29,3,28,,,,,,,,5.2,3.1,3.3*34
I've seen similar things, changes in the order of messages or parts of
the message.
> That was the only error in that file.
> That's with test/daemon/superstar2.log
> It's at least somewhat reproducable and takes a long time using the CPU.
>
> In case it matters:
> model name : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D2500 @ 1.86GHz
>
> -------
>
> sys freebsd12 platform FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-p1-amd64-64bit-ELF: WRITE_PAD =
> 0.00
> Regression test FAILED: 89 errors in 135 tests total (0 not found).
> No timeouts.
Gary gave FreeBSd a try yesterday and was not able to get a single
failure. No idea on which hardware, but I'd assume on some fast desktop
machine.
So I guess BSD and a slow machine is necessary.
By gitlab-runner is running in a kvm instance on a not-so-recent server
hardware with various VMs, so speed depends on the work the other VMs do..
I think I can get some slow and old firewall hardware and run it in the
datacenter and give people access to it - if the issue is reproducible.
I'll figure it out after Christmas.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, (continued)
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/20
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Gary E. Miller, 2019/12/20
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/20
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Gary E. Miller, 2019/12/20
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Bernd Zeimetz, 2019/12/21
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Hal Murray, 2019/12/21
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD,
Bernd Zeimetz <=
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/21
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Bernd Zeimetz, 2019/12/21
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/21
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Bernd Zeimetz, 2019/12/21
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/21
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Bernd Zeimetz, 2019/12/21
- Latest SConstruct (pull a few min ago), Hal Murray, 2019/12/21
- Re: Latest SConstruct (pull a few min ago), Gary E. Miller, 2019/12/22
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Greg Troxel, 2019/12/22
- Re: b32ff1a86 Breaks OSX and FreeBSD, Bernd Zeimetz, 2019/12/22