gomp-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gomp-discuss] GENERIC <-> GIMPLE questions.


From: Lars Segerlund
Subject: Re: [Gomp-discuss] GENERIC <-> GIMPLE questions.
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 07:36:07 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.1-9


Sounds like weere talking about the same thing, it just looks like I'm using the wrong terminology, thanks.

 / Lars.


Diego Novillo wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:


Specificly I would like to know if the existing GIMPLE format allows restrictions on what optimizations are allowed and over which regions ?


No.  And it shouldn't.  GIMPLE is just syntax specification.  The
semantics of the parallel region must be understood by the
optimizers.  It's not that hard, really.  At worst, all you do in
tree-optimize.c:optimize_function_tree() is:

        if (function_contains_parallel_regions)
          return;


If the GIMPLE format allows us to restrict optimizations to a parrallell region, ( not to cross over it's borders ), we don't have to modify the GIMPLE tree's.


There's nothing in the structure of trees that does this.  I
don't understand why you don't want to modify the trees.  You
cannot describe parallel regions if you don't have the tree codes
to support them.


Diego.


_______________________________________________
Gomp-discuss mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]