[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Architecture
From: |
Biagio Lucini |
Subject: |
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Architecture |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:58:13 +0000 (GMT) |
Hi Lars - Since you seem the most active so far, would you mind to write
down a preliminary architecture specification document that can serve as a
starting point for further discussions? Don't worry if there are still a
few question marks, just underline where they are.
Thanks
Biagio
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:
>
> If you have a look at treelang in the tree-ssa branch you can see that
> tree generation is quite simple, so we might even start off without a
> frontend, but only a stub which feeds 'specific' tree's to the backend.
> Thus the backend could be completed before the frontend work, and then
> the handling of the omp directives would be simplified to the insertion
> of a single tree node in the frontends.
>
> This way, a certain 'independence' of the threading model would be
> reached ( actually it would be had for free :-) ).
>
> So the question is, what needs to be specified and what is unknown ?
>
> / Lars
>
RE: [Gomp-discuss] Architecture, Biagio Lucini, 2003/01/21