[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build
From: |
bill-auger |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 14:04:34 -0400 |
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:46:45 -0400 Mark wrote:
> Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but can you explain why they must
> be disjuncts, and what this has to do with 'set -x'?
sry again - having a bad hair day - i was thinking of `set -e`
i noticed that the guard i was replacing was written as a disjunct; and just
assumed it was running under `set -e` - and yes, that was also my bad - i wrote
that original LOC too - it has become habitual to always ensure that commands
which exit non-zero always indicate some unexpected failure
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, Mark H Weaver, 2023/10/05
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, bill-auger, 2023/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, bill-auger, 2023/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, Mark H Weaver, 2023/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, bill-auger, 2023/10/20
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, bill-auger, 2023/10/20
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, bill-auger, 2023/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, bill-auger, 2023/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, bill-auger, 2023/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, Mark H Weaver, 2023/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build,
bill-auger <=
- Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, Mark H Weaver, 2023/10/11
Re: [PATCH] Fix DEVEL=1 build, Mark H Weaver, 2023/10/05