[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rfc5081bis
|
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
|
Subject: |
Re: rfc5081bis |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:23:03 +0200 |
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<address@hidden> wrote:
> OK, and what is the current consensus of that WG about 5081bis? can you
> give me some pointers to discussion to read? I only just subscribed to
> the TLS WG today, and the recent archives are understandably flooded
> with dealing with mitigation of the renegotiation flaw.
For RFC5081bis there wasn't any discussion since it was independent
submission. You can find discussion about the old RFC5081 at
http://www.imc.org/ietf-tls/mail-archive/mail12.html
and over older at:
http://www.imc.org/ietf-tls/mail-archive/mail16.html
> got it, thanks. i'm looking it over now. any reason to believe that
> the source itself should not be public? If i was going to take this
> over and drive it, are there any licensing/copyright concerns i would
> need to be aware of?
No not really, i just sent it in personal to reduce data on list.
regards,
Nikos