[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rfc5081bis
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: rfc5081bis |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:15:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Nikos--
>
> On 12/01/2009 04:31 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>> Due to some procedural issues [0] it is not possible to publish
>> RFC5081bis as independent submission. My last draft it at [1]. I have
>> tried to publish it as AD-sponsored but the area director refuses to
>> publish it as informational. I see no reason to publish it again as
>> experimental, thus I give up. Is any of you interested in adopting this
>> document?
>
> I don't know enough about the process in general or the history of this
> specific draft to be able to push it forward, though i'm interested in
> seeing it formalized. Presumably, the way around the procedural issues
> is to get the TLS WG to approve it, no?
Yes. The way to achieve that is to have people support it from the WG.
> Actually, it looks like 5081 was not a TLS WG RFC -- it shows up as a
> "Network Working Group" RFC here, anyway:
No it is a TLS WG. I don't know the network working group header but it
seems all TLS WG documents have it. Check:
http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/tls-charter.html
for the TLS WG documents.
> Also, is there source for this draft? Are you working on it in plain
> text, or are you using the xml2rfc workflow?
I attached you in personal.
regards,
Nikos