[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about GNU Hurd
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: about GNU Hurd |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:30:48 -0400 |
The reasons are that it is not complete and polished enough to make it a
viable system for people to use seriously; and that it lacks most of the
infrastructure necessary to enable users to actually benefit from the
advantage of the Hurd architecture
The second sound like something people could work on now
that would carry over easily to Hurd-NG when that is ready.
A lot of the first point also could do that.
- Re: about GNU Hurd, (continued)
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Heath, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Filip Brcic, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Banck, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Filip Brcic, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/06
- Re: about GNU Hurd, jemarch, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/05