[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about GNU Hurd
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: about GNU Hurd |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 19:31:31 +0200 (CEST) |
You're right. Working on a short-term version and a long-term
version in parallel is not absurd, IF you already have a complete,
usable, stable system and people are using it.
That isn't the case with the Hurd. Not many people use it, and not
many people will use it until the improvements come that will only
come with major progress. Supporting legacy development just splits
your resources and makes it so the inevitable takes longer.
Well said.
- Re: about GNU Hurd, (continued)
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Heath, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, jemarch, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/10
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Heath, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/07
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Filip Brcic, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Banck, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Filip Brcic, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/06
- Re: about GNU Hurd, jemarch, 2007/09/04