|
From: | RJack |
Subject: | Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues |
Date: | Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:57:53 -0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 |
On 8/6/2010 2:03 AM, voodoo wrote:
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:31 -0400, RJack wrote:On 8/5/2010 9:13 PM, voodoo wrote:On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:24:06 -0400, RJack wrote:On 7/28/2010 8:41 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:SFLC gang 'won' $90,000 + attorneys fees and costs and expenses against LONG INSOLVENT AND ASSETS-DISSOLVED DEFENCELESS defendant on default. Congrats to Eben Moglen and his underlings. LOL.Uh... PJ over at Groklaw says the default judgment against Western Digital proves, "Of course, to collect the money, the plaintiffs mustthat would be westinghouse digital. westinghouse is that company from the last century that makes heavy electric equipment. western digital makes disk drives and is not a part of this issue.You are correct. It is Westinghouse Digital. There is certainly strong grounds to appeal the default judgment by Westinghouse's successors in interest.
How long have they got to start the appeal process?
I doubt they'll appeal. The attorney fees for our modern day legal robber barons are too much to justify an appeal. The SFLC's Dan Ravicher filed a series of copyright cases which he moved to voluntarily dismiss without a stipulated settlement (he failed to plead any copyright registrations). For this the court thinks he's worth $550 per hour. Sincerely, RJack :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |