Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> 
> > RayLopez99 wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jun 4, 5:40 am, RJack <u...@example.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Erik Andersen continues to claim ownership of BusyBox v0.60.2 although
> >> > he has contributed no executable code to the compiled BusyBox binary at
> >> > all -- it doesn't get any more dishonest than this. It would be a
> >> > toss-up to decide who is the bigger liar -- The Sofware Freedom
> >> > Conservancy INC or SCO Inc.
> >> >
> >> > If Western Digital's attorneys allow this rank, fraudulent request for
> >> > default judgment to proceed, they should be restricted to practicing law
> >> > in Siberia.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Right.  And they won't.  This is just another IP troll attempt, this
> >> time by the Linux crowd, to extract money from corporations in the
> >> legal arena after having failed in the marketplace.  Opera browser did
> >> it with Microsoft in Europe.
> >
> > No sane 'troll' would move against utterly assetless and bankrupt
> > defendant.
> 
> If he's in for the money, sure.
> 
> > See "California State equivalent to bankruptcy" in
> >
> > http://www.terekhov.de/BestBuy-117-4.pdf
> >
> > What does the SFLC really want to achieve moving against defenceless
> > assetless bankrupt entity?
> 
> Compliance. 

The defendant is an assetless bankrupt you idiot.

http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/03/articles/the-financially-troubled-compa/assignments-for-the-benefit-of-creditors-simple-as-abc/

"The ABC is an insolvency proceeding governed by state law rather than
federal bankruptcy law. "

> Like always.  

Uh retard dak. Read the memorandum, it's not about compliance, stupid.

http://www.terekhov.de/BestBuy-113.pdf

So once again: 

What does the SFLC really want to achieve moving against defenceless
assetless bankrupt entity?

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)