Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple

[Hyman Rosen]

On 8/5/2010 12:48 AM, ZnU wrote:
> (Mind you, there is some overreach in GPL3, in that it claims you need
> to accept the license merely to _modify_ a work, even without further
> redistribution. IMO this is invalid, as you'd have that right under
> first sale doctrine even without accepting the license.

Not true. Permission from the copyright holder is required to
create a derivative work, even if you own a copy. For example,
you may not translate a novel into another language without
permission of the copyright holder.