gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple


From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:57:36 -0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1

On 8/5/2010 12:01 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Yes. That's not a "fair use" permission as the OP claimed.
It has nothing to do with fair use

Yes, that's what I said.

The idea that the "copyleft hack" of copyright act is enforceable by
the copyright act itself is utterly moronic.

<http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf>
    "Having determined that the terms of the Artistic License are
     enforceable copyright conditions..."

In the battle of crank vs. court, court wins. Always.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]