Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[Hyman Rosen]

On 4/7/2010 2:14 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.comtrend.com/gplcddl.htm

Yes? The archive shows that a version of this page was
present once in 2006 and throughout 2007, but not later.
When present, it contained code for the CT-536+/CT-5621
product. The current web page contains source code for
products CT-5621/CT-5621T, CT-5361/CT-5361T, NexusLink5631,
and NexusLink5631E. The complaint mentions
<http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>
    Comtrend's CT-5621 and NexusLink 5631/5631E ADSL2+
    bonded modems;

So as usual, your posts are self-refuting. What appears
to have happened is that Comtrend at some point stopped
complying with the GPL out of laziness or inattention,
the SFLC failed to gain their notice with attempts at
communication, the lawsuit alerted Comtrend to the problem,
they came back into compliance, and they were dropped from
the suit.