Re: GPL misappropriation

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> >> > Dak boy is having a problem understanding § 35 Abs. 1 Satz 1 UrhG:
> >> >
> >> > http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__35.html
> >> > (§ 35 Einräumung weiterer Nutzungsrechte)
> >> >
> >> > "(1) Der Inhaber eines ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechts kann weitere
> >> > Nutzungsrechte nur mit Zustimmung des Urhebers einräumen. "
> >>
> >> "additional usage rights".  And the "Urheber" (author) has in the case
> >> in question granted his "Zustimmung", given certain conditions.
> >
> > Uh idiot dak.
> >
> > It says that EXCLUSIVE licensee can sublicense ONLY if (iff) the author
> > gives consent to sublicense.
> 
> Yes, we got that (it contradicts your first quote, but then it would
> seem that the authority of the second is better).

§ 35 Abs. 1 Satz 1 UrhG doesn't contradict
http://medien-internet-und-recht.de/volltext.php?mir_dok_id=1715 (LG
Köln, Beschluss vom 09.04.2008 - Az. 28 O 690/07), silly dak.

> 
> But you are still barking up the wrong tree.  What you claim is that the
> author can't explicitly grant a non-exclusive licensee the right to
> sublicense.

That's true, according to § 31 Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 35 Abs. 1 Satz 1 UrhG,
you retard.

> 
> That's not supported by either of your quotes, and it does not even make
> sense.

Let the German Bundestag know about that, silly dak.

http://www.bundestag.de/service/kontakt/index.html

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system 
so that I can do the builds."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)