Re: GPL misappropriation

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
>     Ein Recht zur Lizenzierung von Dritten muss deshalb zwischen dem
>     Urheber und dem Inhaber des ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechtes
                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                  
>     ausdrücklich vereinbart werden
> 
> Which says that sublicensing has to _either_ explicitly arranged for
> (like the BSDL licenses do, allowing the propagation of copies to third
> parties under given conditions)

The BSDL is NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LICENSE.

The BSDL is a non-exclusive license and a non-exclusive license CAN NOT
GRANT SUBLICENSING RIGHTS, that's the German law, you moron.

§ 31 Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 35 Abs. 1 Satz 1 UrhG.

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system 
so that I can do the builds."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)